I havnt had a post in maybe a month, how does this happen? Thanks, I guess…

I havnt had a post in maybe a month, how does this happen? Thanks, I guess…

posted Wednesday 06/02/2010 Permalink
(via jesusislove)
i LOL’ed

(via jesusislove)

i LOL’ed

posted Wednesday 05/19/2010 Permalink

Just deleted my twitter, tumblr probably soon to follow.

I have no need for either of these applications. I hadn’t tweeted in about a month, so i figured it was time.

posted Tuesday 05/18/2010 Permalink
johnburke:

colormelauren:

flipstoday:

So iJustine got #97 on the Maxim’s Hot 100 List… :]

Wow, internet.

iLove iJustine.

iWant iJustine.

johnburke:

colormelauren:

flipstoday:

So iJustine got #97 on the Maxim’s Hot 100 List… :]

Wow, internet.

iLove iJustine.

iWant iJustine.

posted Wednesday 05/12/2010 Permalink
posted Wednesday 05/12/2010 Permalink
Basically exactly how I feel right now.

Basically exactly how I feel right now.

posted Monday 05/10/2010 Permalink
I’ve been kinda MIA. Here’s a great picture to make up for it. If you don’t laugh at it… well, then you probably just don’t get it.

I’ve been kinda MIA. Here’s a great picture to make up for it. If you don’t laugh at it… well, then you probably just don’t get it.

posted Monday 05/10/2010 Permalink
posted Thursday 05/06/2010 Permalink
fuckyeahmath:

I love this problem so much, I saw a lot of people being confused over it so I’m going to explain it.
This problem is a hypothesis. It is an “if-then” it is if a=b then 2=1; however a does not equal b, if it did then a would simply equal a because b would be a
<3
I love math 

um, no. making a logical assumption is not the same as creating an if-then. creating 2 empty variables, and setting them equivalent to each other is not an ‘If.’ there doesn’t exist and sort of scenario in which two variables whose only properties are their equivalence can not be equal. The error in this proof is that a -b = 0, so dividing both sides by such an expression (the last step) is a large mathematical no-no. Its like creating a proof by abusing contradictions to derive anything. Yeah, you can do it, but so what? :)

fuckyeahmath:

I love this problem so much, I saw a lot of people being confused over it so I’m going to explain it.

This problem is a hypothesis. It is an “if-then”
it is if a=b then 2=1; however a does not equal b, if it did then a would simply equal a because b would be a

<3

I love math 

um, no. making a logical assumption is not the same as creating an if-then. creating 2 empty variables, and setting them equivalent to each other is not an ‘If.’ there doesn’t exist and sort of scenario in which two variables whose only properties are their equivalence can not be equal. The error in this proof is that a -b = 0, so dividing both sides by such an expression (the last step) is a large mathematical no-no. Its like creating a proof by abusing contradictions to derive anything. Yeah, you can do it, but so what? :)

posted Wednesday 05/05/2010 Permalink
posted Wednesday 05/05/2010 Permalink
Following these fine Tumblrs: